Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ski jumping projects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of ski jumping projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced list of random projects. Many parts does not make any sense at all. The list is incomplete, as i said unsourced and not very useful. KzKrann (talk) 07:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This appears to be a list of things about ski jumping that are going on right now. That's not a very good topic for an encyclopedia article or list. Compare with List of ski jumping hills. -- Whpq (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as this list topic fails WP:NOT#DIR as it does not have a verifiable definition in accordance WP:LISTS#List content. Lists without a verifiable definition are mere listcruft without any externally validated rationale for inclusion in Wikipedia. A list needs some form of external validation in accordance with WP:BURDEN to demonstrate that it is not entirely novel or the product of original research. Looking at the content of this list, it appears to me to be comprised of original research that has never been published before. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.