- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Lucifer Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this conspiracy theory meets the notability guidelines laid out by WP:FRINGE; it needs to have been "referenced extensively, and in a serious and reliable manner, in at least one major publication that is independent of their promulgators and popularizers". I can't find any evidence that this is the case. DoctorKubla (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this dotty conspiracy theory. It could be notable if it had enough sources, but it doesn't. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Regarding the conspiracy theory, I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources. Most GBook hits for "Lucifer Project" refer to Lucifer (cipher). Location (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obscure even by fringe standards and certainly not notable enough for Wikipedia. Entirely unsourced, except for one highly dubious, self-published, e-book with connections to the editor(s) who essentially wrote this entire Wikipedia article (The primary contributors, Goal-in-hat and the anagram Goliathan, share the name with the ebook author's self-owned "publishing company"). Drake144 (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.