Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmut Uslu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmut Uslu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mahmut Uslu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. All of the sources are news sources that contain the person's own explanations. The sources did not directly indicate the person. I suggest deleting the content. Kadı Message 23:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sports, Basketball, Football, and Turkey. Kadı Message 23:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment He seems to have held some reasonably important positions, and I see an abundance of sources in Google News that mention him in the headline. I can't read Turkish, so it's hard for me to judge, but based on his job titles, I'm not convinced this is a lost cause. I'm curious what sources may exist from the 1980s. Zagalejo (talk) 04:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.