Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make-up Designory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make-up Designory

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Make-up Designory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable beauty school. Only stories available after a quick search on news.google were a handful of press-release-like mentions. ZimZalaBim ^talk 15:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and California. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Almost completely non-notable and only referenced by the school's website. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete seems clear so far, but we need at least a little more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As a private for-profit school and a related cosmetics brand, this one clearly falls under WP:NCORP. I do not find any sources that meet WP:CORPDEPTH, and what is on the page certainly doesn't meet the criteria. We would be looking for multiple sources that meet WP:SIRS and the school website, the only current source, fails under three or all four of those criteria. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'm not convinced there aren't sources, but I haven't found any that will meet the notability standards; [1] was the best independent Google result, and it is mostly "who's who at this party" rather than about the studio. The rest were either their own content, or reviews of their makeup products which felt like sponsored content. Walsh90210 (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.