Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marfio Canoletti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Regardless of the status of WP:KICK, the article does not meet WP:GNG either. Randykitty (talk) 11:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marfio Canoletti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable kickboxer, does not meet WP:KICK Peter Rehse (talk) 16:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet WP:KICK and the article has no significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:KICK and WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Hang on, I've got an issue here. Without prejudice to whether the subject meets the GNG, I'm not seeing any official guideline being referenced here. WP:KICK is the project page for the kickboxing Wikiproject. I see that they've got notability "guidelines" listed there, but that's no more than an unofficial essay unless that gets vetted and added to NSPORTS or some other official SNG. What gives? If it hasn't been made official by no community authority greater than the seven listed kickboxing editors, it's invalid to cite as a deletion criteria. Nha Trang 20:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.