- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Matanage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to be a fairly minor game. The article consists mainly of the rules. No assertion of notability or sources. Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find anything to assert notability here. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: no article for "また投げ" or "またなげ" in the Japanese language Wikipedia; GHits for また投げ and またなげ only turn up use of the phrase, not the game. Circumstantial evidence only - may have currency in English --Shirt58 (talk) 10:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.