Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matheus Santos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keep arguments unconvincing - longstanding consensus that a minimal NFOOTY pass doesn't suffice in the absence of sources. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Matheus Santos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Matheus Santos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and barely passes WP:NFOOTY due to a Campeonato Mineiro appearance. Has no further professional career after this, and has no significant coverage whatsoever. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 07:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 07:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 07:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG. Doesn´t matter if he has played one game or 100 games, passing WP:NFOOTY only means that the subject is likely to meet the general notability guideline. He still has to meet it and if there is no WP:SIGCOV then he fails. Alvaldi (talk) 12:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes NFOOTY and is only 22 years old, could potentially further increase his fully-pro apps. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.