Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximilian Presnyakov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maximilian Presnyakov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Maximilian Presnyakov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have just deleted it from ru.wiki and believe it to be cross-wiki spam. In contradiction to WP:ARTIST, the level of Mr. Presnyakov's recognition in the professional art community is insignificant although his works have some small coverage in general media. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 12:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 12:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looks very sketchy in terms of the way the article is edited. I deleted sources on Docviewer and IMGUR, which points towards fabricated material. Many sources are hosted by a user on archive.org. Manyother sources are web sites of unknown quality converted to "Webcitation". Very sketchy, obviously professionally edited promotional article. Based on that, will take the nom's word that artist is not notable. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and the WP:ARTIST. -- LACaliNYC✉ 07:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.