- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Maxprint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Without sources or context, there is no indication that this brand is notable. PROD was contested. VQuakr (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as advertising/non-notable brand. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Ditto to the above. I am almost tempted to replace with CSD, but i will not. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.