Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meesam Zaidi (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Meesam Zaidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 17:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. No significant sources. Soapboxing. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC).
- Delete. My search came up with nothing notable. This is just someone's vanity page.George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- delete and salt I voted delete last time and see no new significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 14:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and any other possibly applicable specialty guideline. --Randykitty (talk) 14:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.