Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MicroAssist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MicroAssist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

apparently minor developer; single state impact only DGG ( talk ) 20:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not meet WP:AUD. The company has received local coverage, but source searches are only providing mentions in sources with a larger geographic scope, such as this. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I meant to comment earlier, I frankly consider this PROD material and, summarily, there's nothing at all minimally convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.