Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobilelearning exhibition
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Mobilelearning exhibition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems more like advertising than an encyclopedic article Gorgak25 (talk) 14:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — I agree with the nominator. But do we need to delete just for that? I think it also fails WP:GNG. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 17:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This should have been speedied as a G11. §FreeRangeFrog 18:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — I agree this could have been speedy deleted or PRODed. There's nothing currently indicating notability, and I haven't found anything upon searching; it fails WP:GNG as a concept/company/exhibition. JFHJr (㊟) 21:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.