Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NTU ACES (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NTU ACES

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still non-notable cheerleading squad despite existing on Wikipedia for two years now. Corvus cornix_talk 05:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"They are the current 5 times national champion cheerleading team in Singapore, winning the National Cheerobics Competition organized by the Cheerleading Association Singapore (Abbreviation: CAS) since 2006 and The Singapore National Cheerleading Championships organized by the Federation of Cheerleading Singapore(FCS) in 2010." I added a reference to their 2009 win. Winning a national competition (admittedly in a small nation) five times is enough to make them notable. Francis Bond (talk) 00:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable; all of this can be handled in the university article or in an article on the overall association. Neutrality^talk 05:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.