Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Frontier Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Frontier Design

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

New Frontier Design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company making 'tiny homes'. "Best luxury tiny home builder" in The Spruce 2020 awards is the key claim to notability presented. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP - "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources..." Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, United States of America, and Tennessee. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, see table below, only a single source that meets WP:SIRS and WP:CORPDEPTH -- but I'm honestly happy to see at least a single source. Note that the article needs a lot of NPOV improvement, too. —siroχo 09:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table prepared by User:siroxo

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
architectural digest	largely an interview with founder			✘ No
digital trends	[1]		this covers a specific product, with only a few words about the company	✘ No
BBC	company covered by interview with founder			✘ No
insider	heavily relies on interview		~ mostly about product not company	✘ No
the spruce	[2]		in-depth entry in a list, meets WP:CORPDEPTH	✔ Yes
business insider	relies heavily on interview with founder	~	~	✘ No
treehugger	[3]		couple sentences about company, mostly product review	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. I can't find much more about this builder. Oaktree b (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.