Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Apollo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Apollo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Omar Apollo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NMUSICIAN John from Idegon (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC) Lightburst (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)/small>[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep WP:NEXIST No compliance with WP:BEFORE by the nominator. Non-trivial coverage exists and a musician is known for their musicianship. WP:NMUSICIAN is met, and additionally WP:SIGCOV.

• Rolling Stone Magazine
• Detroit Metro Times
• Chicago Reader
• Chicago Tribune
• Here
• Here Lightburst (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Ample coverage found by Lightburst. Pushing the Google news button I see many other potential sources out there, but enough has been found to prove the general notability guidelines are met. Dream Focus 01:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Enough legitimate coverage to pass. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above so there is no longer a need for deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.