- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oval Raceway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Not notable. Extensive refs break down into mostly company handouts to the press. One is on an injury suffered there which apparently was not notable in the long run; a second was a peripheral reference which revolved around mom and pop businesses. The rest were handouts. Appears to be WP:SPAM & WP:PR. Student7 (talk) 00:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Student7 (talk) 00:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question for nominator - what does WP:PR have to do with this article? --Falcadore (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The article provides a sense of importance for what is really a Mom and Pop business. Like the corner grocer, only with more people hanging around. More like a bowling alley, I guess. Student7 (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You didn't actually answer the question! Jeni (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't even remotely pass close to an answer to the question, please I ask again, what has WP:PR to do with this article? Do you even know what WP:PR is? --Falcadore (talk) 01:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The article provides a sense of importance for what is really a Mom and Pop business. Like the corner grocer, only with more people hanging around. More like a bowling alley, I guess. Student7 (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unless there is a specific policy against articles on small race tracks. Enough references to establish that its existence has been recognized. Steve Dufour (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep meets criteria for WP:V and from a variety of sources, inc national newspaper. Other similar venues have articles, so see no reason that this one shouldn't. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 08:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above. Jeni (talk) 10:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability asserted in article. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Angmering, where it is. Karting is not a major sport in UK and in national terms this is a NN venue, though no doubt significant locally. Merger is often the best solution for local sports facilities, churches, village halls, primary schools, etc. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just as a note, this is a motor racing track, rather than karting, although that does take plce as well. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 18:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.