- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Pearson Language Tests. Despite the small participation, the merge seems obvious enough. DGG ( talk ) 19:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PTE General (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Merge to Pearson Language Tests; already merged some of the content. The test is interesting, but not stand alone notable at this time, suggest making it under the Pearson unit. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per the nominator and per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearson Test of English Academic. The parent company is notable; the individual tests are not. Cnilep (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.