- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy redirect to Paragliding.. Article boldly reverted to the state it was in before the controversial, POV edits. The Bushranger One ping only 23:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Paraglider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page has recently been heavily edited by user:joefaust in an effort to push his own highly controversial PoV on this subject. His changes to Paragliding are under discussion and that page is currently locked. Paragliding fatalities, also created by user:joefaust, is currently being considered for deletion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paragliding_fatalities. His changes to this page are, in part, an effort to circumvent those constraints. My recommendation is that this article be replaced by a redirect to the Paragliding page, which already contains the same information as the pre edit version of this page. If there is a case for creating a page containing some of Joe's edits then it should be made on the talk:paragliding page and a page linked from there added only if a consensus is achieved. Jontyla (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy redirect as WP:FORK. Mangoe (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy redirect - completely agree with this page as WP:FORK. Paragliders are fully explained at paragliding and this is simply an extreme, minority opinion trying to bypass the correct description. 88xxxx (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I support a speedy redirect to Paragliding. A separate article on Paraglider is unnecessary -- and this one is written in gibberish. Manormadman (talk) 20:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.