Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychology Internships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Psychology Internships

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hi! I have nominated this article for deletion as the subject seems to be too specific (there is nothing particularly special about psychology internships as opposed to all the other internships) plus the article itself just seems to express a lot of subjective thoughts about psychology internships. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suzuki Tamagotchi (talk • contribs) 16:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete as somewhere between a how-to guide and an essay. Mangoe (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy - as with curates, there could be a decent article here. Bearian (talk) 13:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete - agrees with nominator, subject specific and nothing differentiates this from other internships. Also article format is non standard.Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Most of the text is general to Internship as such, and adds nothing that appears worthy of merging into that article. Much of the remainder is locale-specific (student cohort size, organisation acronyms) and the "Future solutions" section is propositional, not appropriate here. AllyD (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.