Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.I.C. Dildar Nagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

R.I.C. Dildar Nagar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

R.I.C. Dildar Nagar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is supposed to be about a university but cites no sources. The article is plain nonsense and just states it is in the middle of a town. Dellwood546 (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for failing WP:V. The article's information is conflicting. While the categories says the subject is a higher ed. institution, it is affiliated to the state's secondary school board. An online list shows 72 schools in Dildarnagar, and R.I.C. is not on the list. The directory justdial.com lists dozens of universities and colleges in Dildarnagar but nothing like R.I.C. or RIC. The article claims the subject is a very large centrally located school, but no trace of it can be found beyond Wikipedia mirrors. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:V. Assuming good faith, thus must be misnamed, or perhaps it existed only briefly, which is common in Asia. Bearian (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.