Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reporter Magazine (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If a user wishes to merge content, please request at WP:UND. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reporter Magazine

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Reporter Magazine
• Articles for deletion/Reporter Magazine (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Reporter Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability; the only sources referenced currently in the article are primary sources and passing mentions in lists of awards. My WP:BEFORE also fails to turn up significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. Nothing seems to have changed since its last AfD. Bluecrystal004 (talk · contribs) 17:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bluecrystal004 (talk · contribs) 17:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to RIT Andre🚐 18:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable student newspaper with no independent third-party coverage. Article cites only one (primary) source and does not link to anything except RIT. How it survived the first nomination despite garnering no support for keeping it is truly a mystery. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 23:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.