Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richárd Csepregi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 22:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richárd Csepregi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
HLSZ has him down for one professional season followed by several at semi-pro/amateur level. My own Hungarian searches yield no significant coverage for WP:SPORTBASIC. The best that I could find was a brief injury report in Nemzeti Sport. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Hungary. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Nemzeti Sport has 2 more very brief articles on Csepregi, neither of which explore him in detail. [1] [2]. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:17, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - 36 apps for Ferencváros, arguably the biggest club in Hungary, suggests there should be offline sources out there... GiantSnowman 21:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- 20 of those were in the second tier, which probably weakens things a bit. Still, we would expect something about him in newspapers. Nemzeti Archívum doesn't seem to have anything about him between 2005 and 2007. Hungaricana has some hits in reliable newspapers. Fradi is not independent (his club's own newspaper) and is only an image caption. Új Néplap is only an image caption and this only mentions him in passing. Heves Megyei Hírlap is also only a passing mention. Perhaps this could be moved to draft space until one source complying with WP:SPORTBASIC #5 is found? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm finding it very hard to search that Hungarian website - there's certainly nothing on him in my generic web searches, but that website is saying "Csepregi Richárd" brings up no hits whatsoever, which is clearly false. I haven't found any American-style feature stories on him, though, which is generally what people want nowadays. My sense is he's notable, we just need to prove it somehow. SportingFlyer T·C 06:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - WP:SPORTBASIC#5 says Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. My interpretation is that this is a requirement rather than a preference. Has anyone found at least one source that shows significant coverage? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you're looking for the whole GNG instead, multiple significant coverage are usually used. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:24, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it's usually at least two for GNG. As nothing has been found, I suggest we draftify or delete. GiantSnowman 13:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you're looking for the whole GNG instead, multiple significant coverage are usually used. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:24, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm happy with either a soft delete or draftify here. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.