Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RiskScout

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RiskScout

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

RiskScout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I looked and cannot find substantial coverage in independent sources for a WP:NCORP pass. (t · c) buidhe 07:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 07:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 07:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 07:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, zero significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Could be a speedy candidate. Only thing I find is press releases and a few mentions. Well short of meeting WP:ORGCRIT as far as references. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Aside from the press releases, I only found mention of the company through the Techbullion interview that is already sourced on the page, and the company's platform may or may not have been included in a research study. However, this fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Heartmusic678 (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Most of the sources available appear to be press releases or churnalism. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH with nothing substantive upon which to build an encyclopedia article. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.