Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritu Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ritu Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ritu Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved back and forth between draft and main in multiple instances without adding improved sourcing to demonstrate notability. Brief search does not reveal additional sources. Eagleash (talk) 11:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom; no indication of notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not an NBASIC or NENT pass. It is my opinion that articles like this—that have been repeatedly declined at AfD and renominated or undraftified without any effort at improvement—should have a strong presumption toward deletion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Have strong sympathy with the viewpoint expressed by Firefangledfeathers. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Gsearch did not pull notable references Hindustaci (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.