Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby threes

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby threes

edit
Rugby threes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor variation of rugby football that seems to exist only in a few blogs on blogspot. No reliable sources to indicate this is anything other than something made up one day. PROD and PROD2 deleted by author with no explanation. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

]] (talk • contribs) 15:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it is, can you provide some evidence of this please. (NB - not off blogs, they don't seem to cut it with some people. :( )--MacRusgail (talk) 17:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Above !vote is user's only edit to date -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'd never heard of it and I cannot find any coverage of it either. In response to the above user, we do not generally judge things compared to what other topics are covered. (See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Rather, we go by our policies such as notability and verifiability. In any case, a quick search brings up lots of information about underwater rugby, but nothing about rugby threes. Quantpole (talk) 12:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - rugby union wikiproject has been notified. Watch this space.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom and Gnevin unless some reliable sources are found GainLine ♠ ♥ 19:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Hate to say it, but it's a delete for me too, as there just isn't a verifiable source. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep we play Rugby 3x3 in Amsterdam. Its funny, interesting and even heavy sport if you play high level. Probably nobody who play Rugby 3x3 in the world we had thought to tell nothing about it on internet, because we just like to play it. But there are many lovely things in life that not appear in internet. That not means those things not exist. I think you would look for sources out of internet too, for example asking rugby clubs if rugby players play sometime Ruby threes and then youll have the real answer, not only looking for at google.com. Have a nice day and enjoy every kind of sports, not only mega-professional, mafia controlled "sports"like soccer, football and basketball. AmsteRugby —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.210.242.118 (talk) 10:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Tocata, Rugby Threes, Rugby 3x3 or how you want to call it, it's a fantastic rugby modality. Many years ago. Just enjoy it. [[1]] peace&rugby —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.210.242.118 (talk) 11:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - even people who want to keep the article are basically admitting it's completely non-notable. When I was at school decades ago we invented two-a-side football (soccer) and played it very keenly for all of about a fortnight. That wasn't notable, and neither is this -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:20, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rugby_threes&oldid=1305775075"