Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian property bubble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 15:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russian property bubble

Article is not sourced to reliable sources, the only source is a blog. As the "article" states "It is unclear whether the rise in prices represents a bubble condition", so there is likely also to be original research and a problem with WP:SYN. Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 22:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 22:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. Colchicum (talk) 23:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced. India should probably be nominated too. WillOakland (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Move to Real estate in Russia ~~like other "property bubble" articles and source it better. This is definitely a bubble just as it was in US a few years ago. It just did not burst yet.~~Biophys (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is what is meant by WP:SYN. An increase in real estate prices does not mean that there is a 'bubble'. Property prices can naturally fluctuate up and down, with no 'bubble' properties, and there is no verifiable information on the article, it's basically a combination of WP:OR and WP:SYN. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 04:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When it bursts (it will burst of course, I agree) it will be part of a bigger picture to be described in another article, as of now the article is useless. Colchicum (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. As it stands, this is article about real estate in Russia.Biophys (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's a localized problem base on people wanting to live in those cities; no sources for any claims made in article and unlikely to find them. Carol Moore 18:20, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc

Since the contents were moved to Real estate in Russia, this discussion can be speedy closed, "bubble" replaced with a redirect. NVO (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- But it the redirect easily could be deleted and the article resurrected. And I think there are people pushing a POV of worldwide property bubble in several articles on specific countries, with no WP:RS. So I think the best thing is transfer any sourced info, of which I don't think there was much if any, an delete it. Carol Moore 13:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc
  - The article has not yet been deleted to talk about resurrection. Colchicum (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "bubble" article as unsourced OR. (redirect was already reverted, so deletion is needed). Renamed version doesn't have the OR problem i think, but still needs sources - tag for improvement or weak delete.Yobmod (talk) 16:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikipedia is not a crystal bubble. ha. CompuHacker (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.