Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Code (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per G4 at
- 21:21, 29 August 2010 by JamesBWatson (talk · contribs)
- 21:55, 29 August 2010 by Jclemens (talk · contribs)
- 23:10, 29 August 2010 by Dougweller (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure Armbrust Talk Contribs 22:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sacred Code (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about an unreleased movie; per WP:CRYSTALBALL we cannot include until we can at least prove principal photography has begun and then only if production itself is notable; if production isn't notable (received coverage in independent sources), we must wait til near release. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strike that--I see now that earlier today the article was moved to the Article Incubator as the result of a previous AfD; as such, I have added a speedy deletion notice to the article; this can be closed once the article is deleted. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G4 or redirect to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Sacred Code per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Code. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as G4 after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Code. Article recreation is a textbook case for speedy deletion. - Dravecky (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Film is probably not even made. A clear violation of WP:CRYSTAL.scope_creep (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.