Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Shamoun

Sam Shamoun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject. All I could find were blogs and press releases. ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 17:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Christianity. ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 17:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable person with no significant coverate. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 17:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Islam, and United States of America. jolielover♥talk 18:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
less notable people with article that are apologetics. no point in deleting it Mediocremathematician (talk) 20:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mediocremathematician how?? You sourced a blog called God Reports and a social media platform called Reddit. ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 00:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
get better sources then dont just outright delete it. Mediocremathematician (talk) 01:46, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mediocremathematician but there are no good sources online. ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 12:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mediocremathematician they need to follow WP:BLP or else is leaves Wikipedia. ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 12:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He is a YouTuber with a relatively sizeable following AML KING (talk) 01:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@AML KING so? Just because the YouTuber has many followers, does not mean they should have an article. What, you think KreekCraft would work?? ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 12:44, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Well, I guess I'm getting pulled out of retirement just to look at this AfD (I used to watch his content every once and awhile). 90% of the sources cited are low-quality blogs, reddit, and his personal website. However, I haven't fully !voted delete because GodReports does provide some substantive information, although I'm not finding other sources that do the same thing (heck, we could even expand the article using info from GodReports!). (If anybody wants to convince me that GodReports is also not marginally RS, I would like to hear your reasoning). ❤History Theorist❤ 16:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HistoryTheorist maybe but GodReports as one source only might not be enough. ~Rafael (He, him) • Talk • Guestbook • Projects 18:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's why I wouldn't keep it. If @Mediocremathematician would like a copy of it in user space or draft space, I wouldn't be proposed to saving it in there so long as they don't move it back to article space. ❤History Theorist❤ 22:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yea i watched his content to thus i made this low effort article and expected the pros to polish it i am a beginner in wikipedia so take the articles quality from me not the internet Mediocremathematician (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]