Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh Paliwal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 11:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santosh Paliwal

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Santosh Paliwal
• Articles for deletion/Santosh Paliwal (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Santosh Paliwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a resume, unambiguous advertisement of the subject. Previously deleted 3 times. DMySon 18:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon 18:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. DMySon 18:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon 18:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt A search for ""Santosh Paliwal" cartoonist" does not produce any RS. GNG fail. Possibly (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. No reliable sources found. SailingInABathTub (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt Fails WP:GNG. Hulatam (talk) 05:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• delete doesn’t meet basic, fails gng as well.ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per nom. New Reliable Sources added and I found it notable. Uobito (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2021 (UT

• "Keep Per nom"? You would like to keep the article because it is a resume/advert? Also as this account has been created just to contest this AfD, what is your relationship with the article? SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I am the creator of this Article. I have lost the access to the main account for that reason I have made a new account. After seeing the delete discussion I added the resources using which I made this article and I would like to bring this to everyone's notice that This article was by no means made for someone's prommotion or as a resume, it was made using the data available on the net as I thought this was worth writing the article. So i would really like you all to consider keeping this article. Uobito (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails to meet any notability criteria.VViking_TalkEdits 14:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable visual artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt - still does not meet notability guidelines; lacks significant coverage in WP:RS Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Subject of the article does not meet criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. None of the sources are SIGCOV in RS. Netherzone (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG --Devokewater 09:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.