Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scuffleball (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Scuffleball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails the notability criteria. No coverage in reliable sources. --Snigbrook (talk) 11:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the only two Google News hits (here [1]) are a couple of baseball articles that use the word in a manner that has nothing to do with this alleged new sport. Not verifiable, not notable. - Dravecky (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: per G4 as recreation of previously deleted material. RGTraynor 13:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was deleted and then undeleted because another admin disagreed with the AfD result, so I don't think G4 applies. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was not undeleted at deletion review, and is still the same as it was when deleted. I'm not sure if G4 applies or not but it looks like it does. --Snigbrook (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, if it doesn't apply, I'm comfy with Delete as non-notable and without reliable sources; all I could find was the organization's own website. RGTraynor 13:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete more dumb bored college kids doing dumb bored college crap. JuJube (talk) 08:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.