Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherwood test prep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sherwood test prep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Only independent references are two that mention the company only in passing. Reads like a barely-rewritten press release. Google search turns up only directory listings and the like. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable - not covered significantly in reliable sources. —Cybercobra (talk) 17:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable = insufficient references Transmissionelement (talk) 18:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk)  · @783  ·  17:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- —Cybercobra (talk) 17:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as spam. Zero evidence of notability. Internet searches reveal two no reliable sources are available. Bearian (talk) 18:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC) I found this and that, but I stand by my original statement. Bearian (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy already attempted and declined. —Cybercobra (talk) 19:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, I tried. Sorry, Bearian, and I agree with you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence that this is notable. Triplestop x3 20:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I added another link for the notability of the company —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stafford Jaydon (talk • contribs) 00:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply: That is merely another passing mention of the company. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.