Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyam Metalics and Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shyam Metalics and Energy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Shyam Metalics and Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and West Bengal. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence that this company is notable, or is little more than a holding company. Bearian (talk) 07:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I disagree with deleting the Shyam Metalics page. Instead, I propose marking it as a stub, indicating it requires expansion and improvement.

  Shyam Metalics is a significant player in the Indian steel industry, and its presence on Wikipedia provides valuable information. Deleting the page would deprive readers of this information.

  It is a Fortune India 500 company. Deleting the page would be unjustified; it should be retained and improved to reflect its industry importance. 115.187.51.153 (talk) 04:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The time to prove this passes WP:NCORP is now. Not later. Imcdc Contact 12:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Insufficient sources that fulfil WP:SIRS so WP:NCORP is not met. Extra caution need to be taken per WP:RSNOI - Imcdc Contact 11:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.