Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarTex Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

StarTex Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no evidence that this company rises to an encyclopedic level of notability. The page has been repeatedly recreated following deletion as spam. I recommend deleting and salting, until such evidence exists. bd2412 T 18:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The references -- and the contents of the article -- are essentially about the general topic, not the company .There's a reason for that: there are no references to show the ocmpany is notable. DGG ( talk ) 08:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as there's simply no better coverage and my searches found nothing better than minor links at Books, News and Google browser. SwisterTwister talk 07:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:CORP nothing in depth, see guideline. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but I think never. --Bejnar (talk) 14:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.