- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Flybridge Capital Partners. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Stay in MA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Single source is the organization and also indirectly through a press release from the organization republished in the Boston Globe. Originally was a cut and paste from the organization's website. After adding a warning, the original author made a few changes to paraphrase. Further attempts to communicate with the author have been unproductive/ignored. Logo was also deleted on Commons due to lack of verification by the same author as to his/her claim of ownership over the organization's logo. Additionally, I am uncertain about the notability of this organization given its lack of 3rd-party press. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 13:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 07:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 07:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to parent article Flybridge Capital Partners which may or may not be notable itself. Not notable per WP:NOTE. Wikipedia is not a directory of scholarships. Drawn Some (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The program is already mentioned in the Flybridge Capital Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article. I'm not sure how much, if any, of the additional detail is really necessary or helpful. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 07:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also noticed that both articles were written by Yifanz (talk · contribs), who was protective of edits in the Flybridge article that removed links to company blogs, Facebook and Twitter profiles, etc. (even reverting the removals at least once). There is apparent COI there, not that it should affect the decision about notability or copy/paste article creation issues with this article. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 07:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Flybridge Capital Partners, where it's already covered. FCP is questionably notable and could possibly pass WP:ORG, less so for this, which has no evidence of notability StarM 00:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A redirect ({{R with possibilities}} perhaps?) is fine with me, though outright deletion doesn't seem a bad option either. Either way, I don't see much point in merging. The program is already mentioned on that page, and much of the current article is a slightly modified copy and paste of the program's website. Nothing really original to merge. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 08:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.