- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stratus Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:ORG or WP:SIGCOV Chagropango (talk) 06:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Brazil. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - At this time I am happy to support deletion. Some companies of the same name have significant coverage in books, this is an example. However as that company is described as Iranian rather than Brazil, they appear different companies and not seeing any good coverage of this particular enterprise. The article sniffs of a puff/vanity piece to me, and without sufficient sources to convert it into a quality article I support deletion. However, given this is a Brazillian company, happy to change my mind if anyone finds sources in Portuguese MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.