Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, JavaScript Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, JavaScript Edition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The book is notable only in its relation to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Two out of three sources (1 and 3) are primary, source 2 does not mention the book (source is from 2011, and the book is from 2022). It maybe notable enough for ~2 sentences in the SICP article. Artem.G (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Computing. Artem.G (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs This book is an adaption of the original book that is the subject of the article I have linked to. No need for a separate article — Iadmc ♫^talk 11:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: While there are book reviews (This one in an online journal) [1], I'm not sure this would pass notability for books. Oaktree b (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Even if we had more sources about this edition specifically (this has some usable material, for example), it just wouldn't make sense to give it a separate page. XOR'easter (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.