Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart pepper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart pepper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This director seems to be non-notable because he didn't win any awards. Schuym1 (talk) 19:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Karenjc 19:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources in this article leads me to conclude that the article is not in compliance with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Delete. Let the article retuirn in a few years after his notability will be easier to prove or if other editors care to assist. per search 1 and search 2. He and his works have received much attention in reliable sources. Notability is available for article improvement. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Changed my vote. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment: It's to bad that I can't withdraw it, since there are two delete votes. Schuym1 (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: will take a stab at improvement, so subsequent editors and closing nom might note changes. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: Have begun expansion, wikification, sourcing, and external links. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note There seems to be some evidence, or at least mentions, that one of his films was nominated for some awards.... but South Florida films and filmmakers don't seem to get much press in the rest of the world. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I took a look at the sources he provided and they don't show notability. Also, most of them are just mentions. Schuym1 (talk) 03:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - still no evidence of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: Well... the article's better. Hope Floridians or baseball editors can help. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that it's better. He use to be a pro sports player which passes WP:ATHLETE. Schuym1 (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the baseball league he participated in definitely does not confer notability, so if he's not notable for other things, he certainly is not notable per WP:ATHLETE. matt91486 (talk) 15:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• comment per WP:Athlete QUOTE: "Competitors who have competed in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis. Competitors who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports", he does have notability. His professional league career does qualify him per WP:Athlete. But I am through fighting. It can go. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.