Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super OS (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. L Faraone 00:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super OS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a fair amount of consensus now on the article's own discussion page. This article does not meet the criteria for notability, and most of the supporting links have had to be stripped out due to being of dubious neutrality. While I accept the original editor's claim to be acting in good faith when creating the article, s/he's been unable to support any claim of it being noteworthy enough to remain. Time to put this one to bed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2p0rk (talk • contribs) 2010-12-15T11:59:11

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Existing sources are not reliable and I can't find any that are. (If any mention is found in a reliable source, merge to List_of_Linux_distributions#Ubuntu-based instead.) --Pnm (talk) 01:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I think that a couple of substantial articles in sources like [1] and [2] are enough to establish notability of software (though I'm open to persuasion). bobrayner (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bobrayner. Sources are not wonderful but are enough to pass WP:GNG, content seems verifiable, let's err on the side of preservation. --Cyclopia ^talk 00:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.