- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:28, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sust'n'Able (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent RS on the page. Nothing found to suggest there are sources to show independent notability to meet the inclusion standards for inclusion, even if there was it would be better read in context at The Woodcraft Folk JMWt (talk) 09:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 09:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scouting-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.