Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable resource management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable resource management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic program. The mere verifiable existence of the program does not mean that it is notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. No evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. Proposed deletion (with this exact reason) removed by the article's author with no explanation. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.
Delete without prejudice. The underlying concept of this program may or may not support an article; but any such article ought to be about the underlying idea taught, not about this course. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:Common outcomes: "Departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field (e.g., University of Chicago Department of Economics), or produced a number of notable graduates (USC School of Cinematic Arts, Oxford PPE)." There's nothing to suggest this program meets those criteria. --MelanieN (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.