Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas A&M College of Education and Human Development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Texas A&M University. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Texas A&M College of Education and Human Development

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy denied, since TomStar81 actually read the template, unlike yours truly: "Note that educational institutions are not eligible under this criterion." They added, "Go to afd if you want the page axed", so here we are. Individual departments/schools/colleges are rarely notable, and in this case there is no evidence that it's any different for this department. A redirect is the most we should have, barring evidence that the joint meets the GNG by itself. Drmies (talk) 22:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge verified/verifiable content selectively to Texas A&M University, which presently only mentions this part of the university. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above. I think interpreting "educational institution" to decline speedy deletion here is a bit strict. Texas A&M is the institution, this is part of an institution. That's like declining speedy deletion for a specific classroom or lecture hall as an "educational institution". But anyway, not individually notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article. St★lwart¹¹¹ 07:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.