Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Singing Lesson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Singing Lesson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Singing Lesson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Third and final non-notable article WP:WALLEDGARDEN created by same COI editor. Original pages for composer and composition list closed as a result of AfD delete. Maineartists (talk) 23:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Final article AfD: No significant coverage or review in the media or notable performance. All content generated from primary subject source. WP:Resume Maineartists (talk) 23:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  FYI @Maineartists, you don't have to !vote delete after you make a nomination, since the nom is considered a "delete" vote. I know you did not mean to, but you !voted twice, once with the nom (which also includes in this case) the bolded word delete; then again in your bulleted comment below that. You should strike your second vote. Netherzone (talk) 00:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you. I did not know this. Maineartists (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for striking the duplicate. BTW, Maineartists It's fine to leave your comment un-struck, esp. because you make valid, policy-based points in it. Netherzone (talk) 14:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Maineartists (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I am not finding anything to substantiate the notability of this musical work. The sourcing seems to consist of user-submitted content, and online searching reveals score download-sites, databases, and user-submitted content. Fails GNG. Netherzone (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Reviewed, article, did a search, and reviwed :Articles_for_deletion/Matthew_de_Lacey_Davidson Flibbertigibbets (talk) 02:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.