Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Those firmly rooted in knowledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those firmly rooted in knowledge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I could not find reliable sources discussing this concept in detail. Google searches will give lots of hits, because this phrase occurs in the Quran, but I could not find substantive discussion that makes this concept more notable than any other phrase from the Quran. Cerebellum (talk) 19:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's a commonly used phrase, but I'm not aware of any sources discussing in detail. Eperoton (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe if you looked ~~and~~ at the books and scholar links above you would become aware of such sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did scroll through a couple of pages of book results, seeing some clarifications on what the phrase refers to in a particular context, but no comprehensive discussions. If you are aware of RSs on which to base the article, you're certainly welcome to improve it. Eperoton (talk) 21:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like the best solution all around is to merge and redirect this to an article more broadly collecting such concepts in Islam. bd2412 T 23:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.