Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Levy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is clear after relist. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Levy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:N. Page was created by a SPA [1]. CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable in any of his many roles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is clearly punch-packed with PR, it's not even easily navigable to suggest what could be convincing substance.... SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam and used for promotional purposes only. Clearly a non notable individual. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination: this article appears to have been created to advertise Mr Levy. While the article appears to have many sources, none provides in-depth coverage of him and many are actually by him so WP:BIO is not met. Nick-D (talk) 07:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.