- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I appreciate the effort the author and sole Keep put into trying to source this article, as well as his frankness about his limited success at that. But I'm sure he--as an admin and former ArbCom member on other projects--knows that what we have now is insufficient to meet our notability guidelines. Owen× ☎ 13:32, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Trampsta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fail to meet GNG and SNG WP:COMPOSER Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:NMUSIC. Svartner (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - Something is odd here. Very few press articles, but invited in festivals worldwide and YouTube video have millions of views. While the number of views isn't a criteria per se, it could be valuable to keep this article as a placeholder to answer the question "who's that artist with lot of views?", that was my motivation creating that article. From WP:NMUSIC, could weakly match Has composed a number of notable melodies, tunes, or standards used in a notable music genre.. --Dereckson (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Views on YouTube do not guarantee notability. Svartner (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 04:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 05:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.