Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Golden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Golden

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Travis Golden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The current sources are primary or databases, and a BEFORE didn't reveal anything else to support notability here. Let'srun (talk) 02:07, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, North Carolina, and Texas. Let'srun (talk) 02:07, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:32, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Refs fail a check of WP:SIRS, so the article fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—There's nothing here. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Anwegmann (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—lacks SIGCOV so far, asides from the copious passing mentions from sports stats pages.Lorraine Crane (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.