Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USAG compulsory routines (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

USAG compulsory routines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unsourced and little more than a list of exercises in a curriculum, I fail to see any encyclopedic value to this in the slightest Jac16888 ^Talk 21:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We do not need a luaundry list of routines which in essence is a mirror of the regulations of the USAG. The USA Gymnastics pretty much says everything that needs to be said about this topic. -- Whpq (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 16:22, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The first AfD failed because WP:LIST supposedly said lists of exercises are ok, but if it did say that it doesn't anymore. More generally, I don't find this to be an encyclopedic list. It's sort of like a how-to guide in that it's supposed to tell you which exercises you need to do depending on which level you are (I think). It's inherently unstable and incapable of being broadly sourced because it's essentially a list of rules from one organization. It can't be expanded or developed at all. Maybe a list like "list of compulsory gymnastics routnes" would be an okay list; it could compare rules from around the world. But this is such a narrow topic since it's limited to USAG. Per WP:SALAT I find this to be like "list of one-eyed horse thieves in Montana". AgnosticAphid talk 19:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:INDISCRIMINATE. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 19:47, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.