Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unknown Prophets
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unknown Prophets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This topic fails WP:BAND. Sources consist of passing mentions, and customized Google News archive searches this as this are not yielding significant coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Significant coverage exists but is mainly local: [1], [2], [3], [4]. --Michig (talk) 20:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have to say I'm impressed. Article has existed since 2005 and yet I can't find any truly reliable third-party references that could establish notability. Another case of being under the radar? Certainly willing to reverse my !vote here, if someone can source the article because I sure as heck can't. §FreeRangeFrog 20:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This should have been speedy deleted 8 years ago --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This band isn't notable. --Shorthate (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.