Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UserJoy Technology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- UserJoy Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced article about non-notable gaming company Orange Mike | Talk 01:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Might just be bad translation. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 01:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- While I'm painfully conscious of the various linguistic and cultural biases in this project, that doesn't constitute a free pass to say, "If you knew about them, you'd see they're famous." --Orange Mike | Talk 01:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I never said keep. I'm inclined to let the 5 days pass, and see if anyone will attempt to address the notability issue, if not, then I agree with deletion. Possibly send a copy to the author's sandbox/create one.ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 01:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- While I'm painfully conscious of the various linguistic and cultural biases in this project, that doesn't constitute a free pass to say, "If you knew about them, you'd see they're famous." --Orange Mike | Talk 01:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The article claims it one an award three years running, however it doesn't look like the award is very notable. It also co-published Angels Online, but notability isn't contagious. The article is also severely lacking in third-party sources, making the whole article read as one big ad. —BradV 05:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Minorly notable. They've produced several MMORPGs besides just Angels Online. Google search reveals 197,000 hits outside of the company website. No specific coverage that I can find in major newspapers, mostly just minor mentions in gaming websites. The Chinese references that I can find don't seem to be much better, either, although on balance I think this could be remedied with time. However, I've removed one section as a copyright violation, so it may be that other sections are also copyvios, although I couldn't find the sources.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 12:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think that the article needs work, not deletion. Also, just because an article doesn't demonstrate its notability doesn't mean that the subject is non-notable. -Drilnoth (talk) 03:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.