- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per author request. If another admins wants to undelete this because they think it's substantively OK (as opposed to correcting a procedural oddity) I won't consider it wheel warring. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- VFairs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company lacking significant, independent coverage. The two Business Insider articles cited are press releases, and the Mashable article seems to be sponsored. Remaining coverage is routine, non-independent, or limited to trivial recognitions. Mooonswimmer 10:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: This article was deleted by BusterD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) just three hours into the nomination, but the reason given was simply a link to this nomination, which is normally done in conjunction with a traditional AfD closure after the usual seven days (not three hours). Based on the creator's talk page the article was tagged for G11 just before the AfD nomination was started (not by the same person), but I can't automatically assume that means a G11 deletion went forward anyway, or if the quick deletion was otherwise in error. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:07, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. I have restored the article to allow the AfD to run its course. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the undeletion. I deleted per the G11 tag, but am happy to see the subject properly discussed. BusterD (talk) 11:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: the newer page creator has now put the page up for speedy as G7. Given my previous action, I'll let somebody else resolve that tag. BusterD (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.